Raising 21st century citizens

  Last updated July 11, 2018 at 5:08 pm

Topics:  

Australia’s Chief Scientist, Dr Alan Finkel AO keynote speech from 2018’s CONASTA, an annual science education conference.



A few weeks ago I was interviewed for a podcast. The journalist asked me what I expected to see in the classrooms of 2030. I said the first two words that popped into my head. “Human teachers.”


So I expect to see you all back here at CONASTA 2030. And I’ll put up my hand right now to appear on the program, even if I have to appear by hologram.


This event has a special place in my heart.


CONASTA was one of the first forums I addressed as Australia’s Chief Scientist, back in 2016.


I set out my goals, and I asked you to hold me accountable. Well, we’re two years in.


I’ve seen many encouraging developments, and they’re worth acknowledging.


Who would have thought that the Minister for Education could come to CONASTA, and say what he said yesterday, and I quote:


“There just aren’t enough STEM-trained teachers in our classrooms”…


…and then see that speech reported in every outlet from the Daily Telegraph to the ABC?


He touched a nerve. People care.


And that confirms my impression that momentum is growing – in a good way.


But I’ve also seen something else in these two years – something that I worry might derail our progress, or cloud the path.


There’s a growing sense of confusion about what we actually mean when we speak of a “twenty-first century education”.


I say “students should be work-capable” – and people hear “we need to teach generic skills like collaboration, instead of content knowledge like chemistry”.


I say “engage children through real-world problems” – and people hear “great, let’s toss out the textbooks.”


I say “children should develop the passion to learn” – and people hear “let’s leave it up to the children to decide what they want to be taught.”


I can’t explain why so many well-meaning people associate being a twenty-first century worker with knowing less and talking more.


But clearly, the onus is on me to explain what I do mean, and make the case for it.


So today I want to use my time to do two things.


First, I want to talk about why, in 2018, there is still a fundamental duty to teach students content: concepts, facts and principles. Taught by teachers trained as experts in that content, with all the status and resources and professional development that we would demand in any other expert occupation.


Then second, I want to give you an update on progress towards the goal of a better education, a real twenty first century education, for all our children.


* * *


Let’s begin with the importance of teaching content that genuinely challenges the student.


And if you’ll forgive me, I’m going to lead into my argument via the book we could call The Sacred Text.


I mean, of course, the best-selling most highly acclaimed science-fiction novel of all time: Frank Herbert’s “Dune”.


If I can’t quote science fiction to science nerds – and we’re all science nerds here – then I’ll never get the opportunity. So I’m taking it now.


But I promise, it’s relevant.


So: about Dune. It’s a very thick novel published in 1963. It is well worth reading, but don’t watch the movie. Let me repeat. Do. Not. Watch. The. Movie.


You don’t need to know anything about the plot, but I want to introduce you to the hero: a young man named Paul, an exile on a desert planet, trying to wrestle back control of a galactic empire.


One of the first things you learn about Paul is that he has a remarkable capacity for adapting to new environments and mastering new skills.


But the next thing you learn is that this capacity wasn’t born in him. It was instilled into him.


He’d be taught a principle. He’d practice it, again and again and again. He’d apply it in a real-world context.


And then in moments of high stress – no, not a NAPLAN exam, think “digging your own mother out of quicksand”…


… Paul thinks back to the lesson. He thanks his teacher. He applies the content creatively. And his mum survives.


Page after page, we see Paul learning. He’s curious and flexible and agile and collaborative – not because he attended classes on how to be curious, flexible, agile and collaborative, but because he developed those skills in the context of mastering content.


Principle. Practice. Application.


Principle. Practice. Application.


That’s the lesson of Dune.


I didn’t grasp that lesson when I first read Dune as a teenage boy, but I realise now that Frank Herbert was describing a concept that IBM would later crystallise as the “T-shaped worker”.


The vertical line of the T stands for deep expertise in a discipline. You have to acquire that first.


The horizontal bar stands for your flexibility to apply that expertise creatively, as part of a team in a workplace, and to develop new skills as opportunities present. That comes second.


Think of it like a garden trellis. Your subject, or discipline, gives you structure while you grow. Then you have the capacity to branch out.


Without the trellis, you’re just groundcover, sprawling out in all directions, no matter how good the soil or how much love your parents pour in.


And it turns out that people with trellises, T-shapes, are remarkably well-adapted to Planet Earth.


I think of the current CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai.


He was born in rural India. His family didn’t own a telephone until he was twelve. So needless to say, no iPad, no smartphone and no laptop.


His first degree was metallurgy. His masters was in semiconductor physics.


Then he joined Google. He developed the Chrome web browser that you probably use every day. When he was appointed to his first senior role he was praised by Google founder Larry Page for… wait for it… his deep technical expertise, combined with “tremendous entrepreneurial flair”. He’s said to be incredibly quick with calculations with a near-perfect memory for statistics.


He climbed high, on a trellis.


Or how about the leader ranked last year by Forbes magazine as the most powerful woman in the world, German Chancellor Angela Merkel.


She studied physics at university because she did poorly in a physics course in high school and refused to be beaten.


She went on to earn a doctorate in quantum chemistry.


Her political success is often attributed to her capacity to approach problems methodically, combined with a brain described by German media as a “machine for learning”.


One more example: Jeff Bezos, the CEO of Amazon and the richest person in the world.


He describes the ideal worker as an “expert with a beginner’s mind.”


And he specifies that by “expert”, he means “domain expert”, who has mastered the content so thoroughly that she can play with it.


So, building web browsers, leading Germany, running a global corporate empire or tackling giant sand worms on a desert planet whilst saving the galaxy: it starts with learning content, and mastering a discipline.


Now it could be argued that all these leaders were the rarest of the rare: people who would work out how to succeed no matter what.


So let’s look at the evidence from run-of-the-mill Australian workplaces employing bang-in-the-middle-of-the-bell-curve people.


I have had many, many meetings with employers, in my role as Chief Scientist and as Deputy Chair of Innovation and Science Australia; and before that, as Chancellor of Monash University and President of the Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering; and before that, as the CEO of a publicly listed company.


In all my meetings with people actually hiring graduates, no-one has ever said to me: “gosh, we don’t have enough people who know how to collaborate”.


No, what they say to me is: we don’t have enough specialists in software engineering. We can’t find graduates who are fluent in maths. We have meetings where three quarters of the people in the room can’t critique a set of numbers without pulling out a calculator and slowing us down.


They were asking for T-shapes, and getting flat lines – but the flat line wasn’t lifted up and anchored by that all-important vertical pillar.


So I was deeply interested to read a report released last month by the New South Wales Department of Education, prepared by a team led by Professor John Buchanan from the Business School of the University of Sydney.


Professor Buchanan was commissioned to investigate what today’s kindergarten children will actually need in order to thrive in the twenty-first century, not just in work, but in life.


What he found was a widespread preoccupation with the so-called “soft” or “generic employability” skills, coupled with a belief that actually knowing things was outdated.


But the evidence from every field of knowledge he drew on – cognitive psychology, education, philosophy, engineering, applied labour economics – said very clearly: give up content at your peril. I strongly agree.


To be clear, Professor Buchanan acknowledges that future workers – or let’s say “future adults” – do need to develop what he calls “sound learning dispositions”: concentration, resilience, curiosity, and so forth.


But to quote from his report:


“We note that once learning foundations are built in early years education, such dispositions are best acquired in the context of mastering specific disciplines or fields of vocational expertise.”


Generic skills only have meaning within specific domains of knowledge.”


In the words of a participant in one of Professor Buchanan’s workshops:


“What’s the use of learning to collaborate if you don’t have anything distinctive to contribute?”


Indeed. It seems to me that the cruellest thing we can do to school students is take away the trellis of structured subject content, and with it, that deep-rooted conviction that they are capable of learning and contributing.


But if we want a content-rich curriculum then we need teachers who are experts in that content.


* * *


I’m going to return here to Dune.


Remember Paul, the T-shaped ahead-of-his-time, save-the-galaxy hero?


We are constantly reminded of the excellence of his education.


He was trained by a master swordsman. A master musician. A master of mathematics and computation. And his mother: a master of warfare, politics, history, philosophy, chemistry, biology, and more.


The point is that they were all subject matter experts, as well as gifted teachers.


Why was that important?


First, because they knew what they were talking about. And they explained it to Paul in structured lessons.


Second, because they set the challenge at a high but achievable level.


And third, because they rigorously monitored Paul’s performance and reported to his parents.


I smiled when I saw that these were exactly the same three characteristics that the winners of last year’s Commonwealth Bank Teaching Awards had in common:



  • Explicit instruction

  • High expectations

  • Effective use of performance data.


I want to single out that second characteristic: high expectations.


Wouldn’t it be luvverly if children just woke up, on Monday morning, with a voice inside telling them that their true calling in life is… organic chemistry.


But we don’t awake spontaneously to a knowledge of our talents and passions.


We develop them by mastering the foundations – and that means sticking with it.


Your passion, as teachers, is the glue.


It’s particularly important to inspire children towards mathematics. Mathematics is the language of science. And none of us arrive in school at the age of five as native math speakers.


We only gain fluency by learning things in sequence.


And there is no substitute for the precious years of learning mathematics, in sequence, in school.


We know this because we keep trying to find one.


We allowed universities to remove the mathematics prerequisites from courses that really do need a strong grasp of maths – for example, science.


At the same time, we allowed students to enter Year 11 in the belief that choosing advanced mathematics would hurt their ATAR.


That’s how we ended up with a large cohort of students arriving at university and signing on for maths-intensive degrees without the foundations to last beyond their first semester.


We have evidence – including data reported this year – that students who study foundation maths in school, rather than intermediate or advanced maths, are twice as likely to fail first year university biology and chemistry.


But this insight isn’t new.


In 2009, a study conducted at Western Sydney University looked at the performance of HSC graduates in first year university mathematics. 100% of the students who entered university with advanced maths passed. 77% of the students entered with foundation maths failed.


I repeat, fewer than one in four of the students with a background in foundation maths passed the first-year university maths course.


Some might struggle through with bridging courses – but the same study concluded that a short bridging course is an inadequate solution to the problem.


So we’ve known this, not just by anecdote but there in the data, for at least a decade. And we’ve still allowed cohort after cohort of students to pay the price.


It’s not just the price of dropping out, although that’s bad enough, mentally and financially. It might be even worse to scrape through, and then find that you can’t compete for a job.


When I was a CEO employing IT graduates, we would look at their academic records. That got them through to an interview.


But we would also put the candidates through a pressure test, such as a three-hour programming task. Not surprisingly, a certificate from a university that showed they scraped through was not enough to steer them through the test.


We were looking for people like Paul: masters of their subject with the capacity to thrive in stressful situations.


I read their resumes: the Pauls we discovered left their high schools prepared.


Some university entrance course guides currently suggest that mathematics should be considered “assumed knowledge”.


I’ve always wondered what that would mean to a Year 10 student. So I looked it up on a Group of Eight university web site. This is what I discovered:


Assumed knowledge is not a requirement in order to apply, but helpful to have a background in the courses you’ll be studying. If there is assumed knowledge that you don’t have, you might like to consider doing some extra study, or even your own research to get up to speed.”


You “might like to consider” it?


Are we seriously suggesting that you can pick up calculus in your spare time without an expert teacher to guide you?


Assuming you feel like it?


The time to ask and expect bold things from students is not at the end of the school education process – but from primary school.


But if we ask for high standards from students we need to ask it of people who make the decision to be teachers – and we need to support those teachers as the expert professionals they are.


* * *


So now let me turn to the progress of the last two years.


I’ll start with the good.


Number One: we have opened the STAR Portal. Hands up any one in the audience who hasn’t visited our website for extra-curricular science programs. That’s your homework. Everyone else: spread the word. It’s a portal to a world of inspiration.


Number Two: we have delivered the STEM Industry Partnerships Forum report.


It was handed to Commonwealth, state and territory education ministers in April this year. I was privileged to be the Forum Chair.


The mission we were given was to think more strategically about the role that employers can play in school education.


It was not a hostile takeover of schools by companies. Every employer we spoke to was very clear that the responsibility lay with government, principals and schools. Their objective was to help.


But they were used to thinking like businesses: seeing their investments lined up against the outcomes. That’s how you develop a new business line: pilot, evaluate, optimise, scale.


When you’re a business and you put money into schools, how do you know if you’re actually helping? The answer is that you need academic researchers to follow the outcomes.


But the researchers cannot do that without access to deidentified student data that transcends state and sector borders.  But that data is not available because we do not have a national unique student identifier – one of the recommendations in the STEM Partnerships Forum report.


Many of you here today would have first-hand experience of industry-sponsored programs that work, so we know they exist. But we can do more.


We can get more businesses involved, and those who are involved can boost their impact, with better data, and more visibility of good programs that others can learn from.


We’ve put those recommendations to the Ministers, and in the meantime, we’ve got people in industry thinking about what more they can do.


Number Three: we have seen, at long last, some signs of positive movement on the ATAR and pre-requisites.


Recommendation Two of the STEM Industry Partnerships Forum report says: review how the ATAR can incentivise students to study the most advanced and appropriate subjects, and the impact of universities having dropped pre-requisites for courses that require a strong foundation in mathematics.


When we included that recommendation I thought it might attract some comment.


It ended up on the front page of the Sydney Morning Herald.


So I am not alone in my concern that we are sending the wrong signals to students, to parents and to principals.


You, our science teachers, know better.


Now the federal Minister for Education has said very clearly: “All Australian universities should reintroduce clear pre-requisites as part of their admissions processes, particularly requiring maths or science subjects, as well as English.”


And the sector is listening.


The Council of Deans of Science has commissioned ACER, the Australian Council for Educational Research, to look at the relationship between the mathematics studied at high school and performance at university, so that the evidence can be put directly to the decision-makers.


The New South Wales Education Standards Authority is working with universities to investigate the perceptions and reality of ATAR gaming with lower level maths.


Western Australia has already taken steps to boost the recognition of advanced maths in the calculation of ATARs.


And the Australian National University has announced that from 2022, if you want an undergraduate place, in any discipline, then you have to study both English and maths.


We’ve got a long way to go: but at long last, this is real momentum. Let’s keep up the pressure.


* * *


Which brings me to the unfinished business.


Yesterday, Minister Birmingham laid it out in the starkest terms.


He said very clearly, and I will repeat it, because we ought to remember it:


It is unacceptable that secondary school students are taught science or maths subjects by people without specialist skills in science and maths.


The Minister has defined a new aspiration.


Every high school should have access to specialist teachers to teach science and maths subjects. 


And we should strive to achieve this within the next five to ten years.


The aspiration comes with expectations, on state and territory governments and universities.


In welcoming that aspiration, I hope that we will not just focus on initial teacher training – as important as it is.


In-service professional learning is critical, too – a lesson I am urging politicians to learn from the STEM Partnerships Forum report.


Recommendation 3 states: Develop minimum national requirements for teacher professional learning, a proportion of which should include relevant, discipline specific professional learning, that must be satisfied in order to retain ongoing registration as a primary or secondary teacher.


Recommendation 4 says: support principals and lead teachers to develop and implement high quality professional learning materials and teaching practices in mathematics, science and technology.


I recognise that it is not fair, reasonable or realistic to impose a raft of new requirements on teachers that schools simply lack the resources to meet.


But nor is it fair, reasonable or realistic to expect the system to change by itself.


You, of all people, know that in life as in stoichiometry, the equation has to balance: inputs to outputs.


How do you optimise a chemical reaction? You find the right catalysts.


In the stoichiometry of education, there are many potential catalysts: from the curriculum, to teacher training, to school leadership, to workforce planning and class sizes.


But we have to find them and deploy them like chemical engineers: with evidence, with strategy and most of all, with clarity of purpose.


Putting requirements on universities and education authorities is a way of sending the signal: this has to be a priority.


You are the expert teachers who can see the future and are already striving to lead the change.


It is time for Australia to recognise that contribution, resource that contribution, and extend that contribution.


We must ensure that our students are taught to master content, lots of it.


We must ensure that all specialist teacher are subject-matter specialists.


We must restore the relationship between universities and schools through prerequisites that send signals to principals, teachers, parents and students.


We should make data on outcomes available for the benefit of students and for impact research.


And finally, we must clarify the role and operation of the ATAR so that it does not inadvertently send the wrong signals.


* * *


I began with my one certainty for the classrooms of 2030.


Human teachers.


Let me finish with a challenge to everyone here today.


You are our science teachers.


You are specialists in the two halves of the future: the future adults, and the future technologies


Artificial intelligence. Gene editing. New sources of energy. So much more.


You see the humans in front of you and the technology already entering the classroom, continuing to evolve together.


So you are the Ambassador of the Future in your school.


I hope you will embrace that role, and challenge your students to think about the sort of society we want to be.


And I hope you will keep making the case in your schools, and to your colleagues, for nurturing those T-shapes: if you need to, by reference to Dune.


If you remember nothing else, take away that lesson: heroes learn hard content from fabulous teachers.


Oh – and Never. Watch. The. Movie.


May the Force be with you.


This is an edited version of a speech given by Dr Alan Finkel at 2018’s CONASTA, one of the biggest conferences and showcases for Australian science educators.




About the Author

Alan Finkel
Dr Finkel is a neuroscientist, entrepreneur and philanthropist. He invented a commercially successful device which substantially speeds up drug research. Dr Finkel is the President of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ex-officio) and Chancellor of Monash University. He founded the science magazines Cosmos and G: The Green Lifestyle Magazine, contributes towards a number of research institutes and is Patron of the Australian Science Media Centre. In 2016, he was appointed Australia’s Chief Scientist.

Published By

Science and technology is as much a part of our cultural fabric as art, music, theatre and literature. They play a significant role in our daily lives, yet, in a world dependent on science, we often take them for granted. Australia’s Science Channel believes every citizen has a right, and a responsibility, to be informed, and our mission is to create programs to bring that about.


Featured Videos

Placeholder
James Cameron talks science
Placeholder
In Class With.....David Suzuki - The Environment
Placeholder
In Class With.....David Suzuki - Career
Placeholder
Sustainable water use with Doug Green
Placeholder
Why is Indigenous science important?
Placeholder
Vanessa Pirotta - Using drones to collect whale snot (FameLab Australia 2018 Winner)
Placeholder
Toby Hendy - Poking Plants (FameLab Australia 2018 Runner-Up)
Placeholder
Muthu Vignesh Vellayappan - Groovy Patches (FameLab Australia 2018 Audience Choice)
Placeholder
Taryn Laubenstein - The Tail of Two Fishes
Placeholder
Richard Charlesworth - Coeliac disease diagnosis can be a pain in the posterior
Placeholder
Pegah Maasoumi - Solar Windows
Placeholder
James Wong - Breathing while you hop: How do kangaroos do it?
Placeholder
Ben McAllister - The ORGAN Experiment: Shining a light on dark matter
Placeholder
Mortaza Rezae - Empowering beautiful minds
Placeholder
Zane Stromberga - Can allergy drugs beat bladder disease?
Placeholder
Working In.....Art - Astrophotography
Placeholder
What's the best way to move - springs or muscles?
Placeholder
FameLab Australia Semi-Final Highlights
Placeholder
Saving lives with platypus milk
Placeholder
How Australia's politicians see our future in space
Placeholder
Keeping satellites in the loop
Placeholder
Tim Flannery talks about COP
Placeholder
Tim Jarvis & Tim Flannery talk Climate Change
Placeholder
Andy's Week in Science - robo baby, university rankings, and cancer on circadian rhythms
Placeholder
From chocolate factory to surgery - the milliDelta robot
Placeholder
Andy's Week in Science: video games, low tech transition windows and a new CRISPR technique
Placeholder
Science lessons useful in Art Restoration career
Placeholder
Are drones the future of racing?
Placeholder
The future of esports according to the experts
Placeholder
Seeing is believing with artist Eugenie Lee
Placeholder
The human impace of Art Science collaboration
Placeholder
Follow your Interests in Robotics
Placeholder
Zoz on 3D Printing
Placeholder
Flavia Tata Nardini on women in engineering
Placeholder
Flavia Tata Nardini on the future of the internet
Placeholder
Explore the ocean floor and Antarctic biodiversity
Placeholder
Follow your interests in Medical Research
Placeholder
Artists on Science
Placeholder
What is Space Archaeology?
Placeholder
Follow your Interests
Placeholder
Scientists on Art
Placeholder
3D Printing in Medical Research
Placeholder
Ethical Issues
Placeholder
Problem Solving - Robotics at Dermatec
Placeholder
Problem Solving with CSI
Placeholder
Tamarah King - Earthquake Geologist
Placeholder
True or False with Bajo and Rad BONUS ROUND
Placeholder
True or False with Bajo & Rad
Placeholder
Andy's Week in Science - Cats vs Dogs
Placeholder
FameLab 2018 - Get Involved!
Placeholder
Nural Cokcetin - How FameLab changed my life
Placeholder
Erinn Fagan-Jeffries - How FameLab changed my life
Placeholder
Noushin Nasiri - How FameLab changed my life
Placeholder
Ronald Yu - How FameLab changed my life
Placeholder
Alan Duffy's Top 5 Science Communication Tips
Placeholder
A Judge's Top Tips for FameLab Australia
Placeholder
Brain Candy - Why, Why, Why Michael Stevens?
Placeholder
The Past, Present, and Future of Malaria
Placeholder
This is a video of poo pills being made!
Placeholder
Mind Games - Sports Psychology
Placeholder
Fuel to Win - Sports Nutrition
Placeholder
Fifty years since Australia beat the world to space
Placeholder
ECR Network: Talk Your Science with Alan Duffy
Placeholder
Andy's Week in Science - chimps, klompen, and clouds
Placeholder
Our robot medicine future - heart huggers and micro biohybrids
Placeholder
Six Awkward Cancer Questions
Placeholder
How do you tell if a whale is left-handed?
Placeholder
She Flies - Turning Girls into Drone Pilots
Placeholder
Andy's Week in Science - Magnetic Fabric, Cancer Treatments, and Echolocation
Placeholder
The Science of Sexuality
Placeholder
Sailing Through Space with Bill Nye
Placeholder
Using Sports Science to Help Olympic Athletes
Placeholder
Three and a Half Minutes of Top Shelf Career Advice
Placeholder
New Space Tech with Andrea Boyd
Placeholder
Kelly Meets the Mars Curiosity Rover
Placeholder
Hearts, Opera, and Tough Conversations - Andy's Week in Science
Placeholder
Bill Nye on Science, Girls, and Saving the World!
Placeholder
2017 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science Part 2
Placeholder
2017 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science Part 1
Placeholder
Who Decides the Law in Space?
Placeholder
Scientists Watch Collision That Created Gravitational Waves
Placeholder
Getting Cold Feet Leads to a Whole New Career
Placeholder
ECR Network - Why Every Scientist Should Be on Twitter - The Benefits
Placeholder
ECR Network - Why Every Scientist Should Be On Twitter - The Fears
Placeholder
Live Podcast - Life Vs Science
Placeholder
Origami Robots, Babies, and Kidneys - Andy's Week in Science
Placeholder
Namira Salim and the Zero-G Peace Summit
Placeholder
Elon Musk's Mars Plan: Expert Analysis
Placeholder
SPACE AF - Thursday
Placeholder
My Time in Space
Placeholder
IAC TV Daily Broadcast - Wednesday
Placeholder
SPACE AF - Wednesday
Placeholder
IAC TV Daily broadcast - Tuesday
Placeholder
SPACE AF - Tuesday
Placeholder
IAC TV daily broadcast - Monday
01:00:41
Placeholder
SPACE AF - Monday
Placeholder
Live from IAC 2017
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Technology Rewrites History
Placeholder
Methamphetamine - Gateway Drug to Parkinson's Disease
Placeholder
Concussion, 3D BioPrinting, and The Universe - Andy's Week in Science
Placeholder
Pulsars, Clearwigs, and Pacemakers - Andy's Week in Science
Placeholder
Revolutions - The Quest to Transform HPV Racing
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Hurricane Irma Blows Away Tesla's Rip Off
Placeholder
Experts React to Alcohol Industry Concealing Cancer Links
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - The Limit of Your Lifespan
Placeholder
The Recipient
Placeholder
Think Like a Scientist: Natural Selection in an Outbreak
Placeholder
The End of Snow
Placeholder
The Next Rembrandt
Placeholder
The Discarded
Placeholder
The Spectators
Placeholder
Test Tube Babes
Placeholder
Pangolins in Peril- A Story of Rare Scales
Placeholder
Rock Art Project
Placeholder
Pork.0
Placeholder
OWSIA (Darkened Water)
Placeholder
Nex
Placeholder
Northern Quolls
Placeholder
Dish Life
Placeholder
At Street Level
Placeholder
Custom Love
Placeholder
Adrift
Placeholder
A Story from Space
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - The Most Dangerous Thing in Boxing May Be the Gloves
Placeholder
ECR Network 2017 – Get Interdisciplinary!
01:27:00
Placeholder
Chris Hadfield: The Future of Space Exploration
Placeholder
Chris Hadfield: Life After Space
Placeholder
Chris Hadfield: Life in Space
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Let's Make Algae Australian of the Year
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Australia's Energy Showdown
Placeholder
Nine Awkward Astrophysicist Questions
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - There's No Such Thing as an Exercise Pill
Placeholder
National Science Week Awards Show
Placeholder
ECR Network 2017 - Grant Writing Workshop
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Your 5 Step Asteroid Success Plan
Placeholder
National Science Week Forecast
Placeholder
Open Doors. Open Future. Open Day.
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Lose a Little to Gain Millions
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Crowd Sourcing Origami Astronaut Protection
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - T-Rex's Prehistoric Power Walk
Placeholder
True or False with Kale Brock
Placeholder
The Grandfather Paradox
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - The Hidden Heroes Tackling Mozzies
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Emergency AI Assistance
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Frogs Forever, Dinosaurs Never!
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Australia, Let's Go To Space
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Welcome to the Microbiome, Archaea!
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Roos Blindside Driverless Cars
Placeholder
Biodiversity of Antarctica Under Threat From Increase In Ice-Free Areas
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - The Future of the Census
Placeholder
Tell Me! Brian Cox
Placeholder
Crash, Burn, Tweak, Repeat
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Humans Just Got Older and Wiser
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Cheers to Brain Health?
Placeholder
Gene Therapy Could Cure Allergies
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - iHeart Hacking
Placeholder
Ridiculology - New Hubble
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Trees Alone Can't Save Us
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Earth's Accidental Force Field
Placeholder
Dinosaurs on the Big Screen
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Farewell MP3
Placeholder
Kids Beat Grown-ups on Pneumonia Vaccines
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - The Booger Conspiracy
Placeholder
FameLab 2017 National Final - Part 2
Placeholder
FameLab 2017 National Final - Part 1
Placeholder
2017 Budget Response
Placeholder
What Are Animal Weapons?
Placeholder
If You Love Both Art and Science, Be a Scientific Illustrator
Placeholder
Getting Personal With Skinks
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - CSIRO Email Leaks
Placeholder
FameLab 2017 Western Australia Semi-Final Highlights
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - New Hope for Premmies
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Britain Goes Coal-Free
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Naked Mole-Rats (SFW)
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Easter Reminders
Placeholder
Meet Andrea Boyd - Space Flight Controller
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Sperm Drug Smugglers
Placeholder
FameLab 2017 New South Wales Semi-Final Highlights
Placeholder
The Science of Fiction
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Liquorice Poisoning
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Crowdsourcing Science
Placeholder
FameLab 2017 Queensland Semi-Final Highlights
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - SpaceX Preps for Relaunch
Placeholder
Poly Cystic Ovary Syndrome Breakthrough
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Surviving a Media Storm
Placeholder
Will This Aussie Team Win the Race to Create the Ultimate Malaria Vaccine?
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - New Dino Family Tree
Placeholder
How to fix things with Kyle Wiens
Placeholder
Repair or replace? iFixit co-founder Kyle Wiens
Placeholder
Special Investigation - No Alternative to Cancer
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Raspberry Pi is Number 3 Best-Selling Computer
Placeholder
If reefs can't adapt, are they doomed?
Placeholder
Art, Music, Science, Society - Sir Tim Smit Has Thoughts On It All
Placeholder
Assembling the Best Team (according to Sir Tim Smit)
Placeholder
What's up with the Rogue Ginger?
Placeholder
Make Me A Martian
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Recognising the Ethical Dilemma in Facial Tracking Software
Placeholder
Science Communication Around the Globe
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Elon to the Rescue
Placeholder
Sing Us a Song, Spaceman!
Placeholder
Feather Map Of Australia Citizen Science Project
Placeholder
Tim Jarvis vs Mountain: Neuroscience
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Don't Pee in the Pool!
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - A New Organ That's as Old as You Are
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Australia's Bill of Sexual Health
Placeholder
Budget 2016 - The Science Forecast
Placeholder
Ideas Boom - What the Innovation Statement Means for You
Placeholder
Celebrating the 2016 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science
Placeholder
Behind the Scenes at Science Meets Parliament 2016
Placeholder
ECRN - Publish or Perish - A Trip Down the Ugly Side
Placeholder
ECRN - Publish or Perish with Corey Bradshaw
Placeholder
ECRN - Publish or Perish with Angela Eggleston
Placeholder
Coral Bleaching Explained: the story of Frank the coral
Placeholder
The Amazing Life Cycle of the European Eel
Placeholder
Zero Gravity
Placeholder
ECRN - Grant Writing Workshop
Placeholder
ECRN - Managing the Balance
Placeholder
ECRN - Research Linkages with Industry
Placeholder
ECRN - Alternative Careers with Dr Leigh Guerin
Placeholder
ECRN - How to Collaborate with Industry
Placeholder
ECRN - Alternative Careers Q&A
Placeholder
ECRN - Collaborating with Industry
Placeholder
Ground Control to Major Chris
Placeholder
Jane Elith - Life Scientist of the Year, 2015 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science
Placeholder
Graeme Jameson - winner of Prize for Innovation, 2015 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science
Placeholder
Graham Farquhar – Scientist of the Year, 2015 Prime Minister’s Prizes for Science
Placeholder
Tim Jarvis vs Mountain: Endurance
Placeholder
Secrets of the Panama Papers
Placeholder
Susan Greenfield is here to tell you about your brain!
01:03:11
Placeholder
Brew La La - Oscars 2017
Placeholder
Creating The Airbus A380
Placeholder
Science Meets Business 2016
Placeholder
Minister Pyne's speech - 2015 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science
Placeholder
2016 Year in Review
Placeholder
Brew Ha Ha - Sweaty Robots From Japan
Placeholder
Think You Might Be a Programmer?
Placeholder
Want to start coding? Here's some basic tips