Yes, more carbon dioxide helps plants grow – but it’s no excuse to downplay climate change

  Last updated March 3, 2020 at 5:06 pm

Topics:  

“It doesn’t mean we should, as climate sceptics have done, use the concept of carbon dioxide fertilisation to downplay the severity of climate change.”


carbon dioxide fertilisation_trees_green carbon

Forests absorb carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere and then store it in vegetation and soils. Credit: Shutterstock.




Why This Matters: Forests play a huge role in mitigating global warming – it’s vital we protect them.




The alarming rate of carbon dioxide flowing into our atmosphere is affecting plant life in interesting ways – but perhaps not in the way you’d expect.


Despite large losses of vegetation to land clearing, drought and wildfires, carbon dioxide is absorbed and stored in vegetation and soils at a growing rate.


This is called the “land carbon sink”, a term describing how vegetation and soils around the world absorb more carbon dioxide from photosynthesis than they release. And over the past 50 years, the sink (the difference between uptake and release of carbon dioxide by those plants) has been increasing, absorbing at least a quarter of human emissions in an average year.


carbon dioxide fertilisation_trees_green carbon


The sink is getting larger because of a rapid increase in plant photosynthesis, and our new research shows rising carbon dioxide concentrations largely drive this increase.


So, to put it simply, humans are producing more carbon dioxide. This carbon dioxide is causing more plant growth, and a higher capacity to suck up carbon dioxide. This process is called the “carbon dioxide fertilisation effect” – a phenomenon when carbon emissions boost photosynthesis and, in turn, plant growth.


What we didn’t know until our study is just how much the carbon dioxide fertilisation effect contributes to the increase in global photosynthesis on land.


carbon dioxide fertilisation_trees_green carbon


But don’t get confused, our discovery doesn’t mean emitting carbon dioxide is a good thing and we should pump out more carbon dioxide, or that land-based ecosystems are removing more carbon dioxide emissions than we previously thought (we already know how much this is from scientific measurements).


And it definitely doesn’t mean we should, as climate sceptics have done, use the concept of carbon dioxide fertilisation to downplay the severity of climate change.


Rather, our findings provide a new and clearer explanation of what causes vegetation around the world to absorb more carbon than it releases.




Also: Paris is burning! Carbon emissions on the rise




What’s more, we highlight the capacity of vegetation to absorb a proportion of human emissions, slowing the rate of climate change. This underscores the urgency to protect and restore terrestrial ecosystems like forests, savannas and grasslands and secure their carbon stocks.


And while more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does allow landscapes to absorb more carbon dioxide, almost half (44%) of our emissions remain in the atmosphere.


More carbon dioxide makes plants more efficient


Since the beginning of the last century, photosynthesis on a global scale has increased in nearly constant proportion to the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Both are now around 30% higher than in the 19th century, before industrialisation began to generate significant emissions.


Carbon dioxide fertilisation is responsible for at least 80% of this increase in photosynthesis. Most of the rest is attributed to a longer growing season in the rapidly warming boreal forest and Arctic.


So how does more carbon dioxide lead to more plant growth anyway?


Higher concentrations of carbon dioxide make plants more productive because photosynthesis relies on using the sun’s energy to synthesise sugar out of carbon dioxide and water. Plants and ecosystems use the sugar both as an energy source and as the basic building block for growth.


forests_trees_green carbon

Ecosystems such as forests act as a natural weapon against climate change by absorbing carbon from the atmosphere. Credit: Shutterstock


When the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air outside a plant leaf goes up, it can be taken up faster, super-charging the rate of photosynthesis.


More carbon dioxide also means water savings for plants. More carbon dioxide available means pores on the surface of plant leaves regulating evaporation (called the stomata) can close slightly. They still absorb the same amount or more of carbon dioxide, but lose less water.


The resulting water savings can benefit vegetation in semi-arid landscapes that dominate much of Australia.


We saw this happen in a 2013 study, which analysed satellite data measuring changes in the overall greenness of Australia. It showed more leaf area in places where the amount of rain hadn’t changed over time. This suggests water efficiency of plants increases in a carbon dioxide-richer world.


Young forests help to capture carbon dioxide


In other research published recently, we mapped the carbon uptake of forests of different ages around the world. We showed forests regrowing on abandoned agricultural land occupy a larger area, and draw down even more carbon dioxide than old-growth forests, globally. But why?




Elsewhere: If we want to control greenhouse gases then we need to think ‘blue carbon’




In a mature forest, the death of old trees balances the amount of new wood grown each year. The old trees lose their wood to the soil and, eventually, to the atmosphere through decomposition.


A regrowing forest, on the other hand, is still accumulating wood, and that means it can act as a considerable sink for carbon until tree mortality and decomposition catch up with the rate of growth.


This age effect is superimposed on the carbon dioxide fertilisation effect, making young forests potentially very strong sinks.


In fact, globally, we found such regrowing forests are responsible for around 60% of the total carbon dioxide removal by forests overall. Their expansion by reforestation should be encouraged.


Forests are important to society for so many reasons – biodiversity, mental health, recreation, water resources. By absorbing emissions they are also part of our available arsenal to combat climate change. It’s vital we protect them.


This article was co-authored with Vanessa Haverd and Pep Candell from CSIRO and from Université de Lorraine.


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


More Like This


Cutting our own emissions isn’t enough – it’s our exports that matter too


Intermittent rivers boost global carbon emissions




About the Author

Benjamin Smith
Ben Smith is the Director of Research at the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at the Western Sydney University. He is an ecologist and ecosystem modeller interested in the role of population and community processes in the structural and functional dynamics of the world’s major ecosystem types, or biomes.

Published By

Western Sydney University has its heart in the west, with campuses in Bankstown, Parramatta, Penrith, Blacktown, Hawkesbury and Campbelltown.


Western Sydney University is a research institution driven by impact.


We believe excellent research and practical outcomes are essential parts of our overarching research mission. Our research has real impact upon the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of our regional, national and international communities.


Featured Videos