We can “shrink” the COVID-19 curve, rather than just flatten it

Proudly supported by

  Last updated April 21, 2020 at 5:00 pm

Topics:  

Flattening the curve of COVID-19 will not only reduce pressure on our health system – it can reduce the number infected too.


COVID-19 coronavirus curve

Public health measures, in particular intensive case-finding and strict enforcement of isolation and quarantine, can potentially “shrink” the curve. Image: Shutterstock




Why This Matters: We all can play a role in reducing the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19.




Leaders and officials who are currently making crucial decisions about responses to COVID-19 can take heart that “flattening” the epidemic curve will not inevitably result in a need to apply drastic social distancing measures over a much longer period of time: our epidemiological simulation models show that public health interventions can do more than just “flatten” the COVID-19 epidemic curve.


These measures, in particular intensive case-finding and strict enforcement of isolation and quarantine, can potentially “shrink” the curve, resulting in many fewer cases and deaths overall, with minimal or no extension to the duration of the epidemic.




Deeper: Australian experts answer those burning coronavirus questions




What do we mean by “flattening the curve”?


“Flattening the curve” has rapidly become a rallying cry in the fight against COVID-19, popularised by media outlets and leaders worldwide. The COVID-19 “flattening the curve” infographic, which seems to have first appeared in The Economist on 29 February 2020, has entered our collective consciousness. Ubiquitous versions of this infographic depict “flattening” of the curve as a reduction in the peak number of cases, thereby helping to prevent the health system from being overwhelmed.


But they also suggest worrying consequences: “flattening” approximately doubles the duration of the epidemic, and the total burden of cases remains the same. This implies that social distancing measures and management of cases, with their devastating economic and social impacts, may need to continue for twice as long if we go all-out to “flatten the curve”.


However, there appears to be no empirical basis to the idea that “flattening the curve” lengthens the epidemic, which is what we wanted to explore with our modelling.


COVID-19 coronavirus infection routes

The researchers’ model allocates each member of its hypothetical population to one of seven compartments. Image: Tim Churches / Louisa Jorm


A stochastic individual contact model


To better understand the impact of public health interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic curve, we have constructed a stochastic individual contact model – i.e. a model that incorporates much of the randomness and unpredictability of real life at the individual level, such as chance meetings or contact with potentially infectious strangers.


This allowed us to simulate spread in a hypothetical population of 100,000 people under different intervention strategies. The model permits tweaking of multiple parameters relating to the epidemiology of the virus and specific interventions, unlike simpler models.


Our model allocates each member of its hypothetical population to one of seven compartments. The dashed arrows represent interpersonal interactions through which transmission of infection may occur. The solid arrows include possible transitions between compartments.




Elsewhere: From the Frontline: Singapore




We modelled intervention scenarios by varying the number of times individuals in the various compartments interact with each other.


The baseline case assumes 3 infected individuals at day 1, an average of 10 interpersonal interactions per day, 5% probability of infection following interactions with infectious individuals, 3% of symptomatic individuals self-isolate (with 2.5 interactions per day) on each day of illness, hospital capacity is 400 beds, and case fatality is doubled for cases above this limit who require hospitalisation.


Our six intervention scenarios looked like this:



  • Scenario 1:  Ramp up self-isolation from days 1 to 15, such that the proportion of newly symptomatic and/or diagnosed individuals who self-isolate on each successive day of illness increases from 3% to 33%.

  • Scenario 2:   As for Scenario 1 except that the proportion of individuals who self-isolate increases from 3% to 66%.

  • Scenario 3:  Scenario 1 plus ramp up of moderate social distancing from day 15, such that the daily number of interactions in the population overall is reduced from 10 to 5 over a further 15 days, where it stays for a further 45 days, before increasing back up to 10 (i.e. total of ramp-up plus maintenance period is 60 days).

  • Scenario 4:  Scenario 1 plus 30-day lockdown from day 30, such that the daily number of interactions in the population overall is immediately reduced from 10 to 2.5, then increases back up to 10 from day 60.

  • Scenario 5:  As for Scenario 4 except lockdown is for 60 days, lasting until day 90.

  • Scenario 6:  Scenario 5, with the addition of self-isolation with high compliance commencing at 90 days (66% of newly symptomatic and/or diagnosed individuals self-isolate on each successive day of illness).


Which intervention scenarios are most effective? 


COVID-19 infection scenario results

The results: the researchers modelled intervention scenarios by varying the number of times individuals in the various compartments interact with each other. Image: Tim Churches/Louisa Jorm


Under all of our intervention scenarios, the COVID-19 epidemic curve is substantially flattened AND shrunk, with far fewer cases and deaths overall. Under most scenarios, the number of cases requiring hospitalisation briefly overwhelms assumed hospital capacity, but at different time points.


Scenario 1 demonstrates that moderate compliance with self-isolation substantially dampens the epidemic and reduces deaths by around one-third. Scenario 2, which perhaps resembles the extreme case finding and enforcement of self-isolation and quarantine enacted in South Korea and Singapore, results in almost complete suppression of the epidemic, with no second peak in cases, or “rebound”.


Scenario 3, which combines ramp up of self-isolation and social distancing and is perhaps analogous to the Australian response to date, results in reduction in cases and deaths by around one-third. A rebound in cases that is much larger than the initial, suppressed, peak occurs at around day 90.




Also: How to survive isolation, by an expert (and astronauts)




Among the “lockdown” scenarios, Scenarios 4 and 5 demonstrate a similar rebound in cases, which is delayed according to the duration of the lockdown. A small and very delayed rebound occurs in Scenario 6, which combines lockdown and subsequent high compliance with self-isolation.


Our findings are broadly consistent with those produced by modellers at Imperial College using scenarios for the United Kingdom and USA.


What next?


Our work illustrates the complexity of predicting the potential impact of public health interventions on the course of the COVID-19 epidemic and it is important to note that our model has been developed very rapidly at a time when we don’t have good data to inform many of our assumptions.


However, encouragingly, our modelling strongly suggests that we can “shrink the curve” and reduce COVID-19 cases and deaths with strong public health action and without prolonging the nightmare of lockdown and social distancing. We shall continue to refine our model and it is freely available for others to use, test and further develop to ensure that policy actions are informed by the best possible evidence


The model is described in greater detail on Tim’s Website, and the code is available on Github.


This article was co-authored with Louisa Jorm, Director of UNSW’s Centre for Big Data Research in Health.


More Like This


What we know (and don’t know) about the COVID-19 virus


A vaccine against the virus that causes COVID-19 just took a huge step forward




About the Author

Tim Churches
Tim is a senior research fellow at the UNSW Medicine South Western Sydney Clinical School at Liverpool Hospital, and a visiting fellow at the Centre for Big Data Research in Health at UNSW Sydney. His background is in general medicine, general practice medicine, occupational health, public health practice, particularly population health surveillance, and clinical epidemiology.

Published By

Featured Videos

Placeholder
Big Questions: Cancer
Placeholder
A future of nanobots in 180 seconds
Placeholder
Multi-user VR opens new worlds for medical research
Placeholder
Precision atom qubits achieve major quantum computing milestone
Placeholder
World's first complete design of a silicon quantum computer chip
Placeholder
Micro-factories - turning the world's waste burden into economic opportunities
Placeholder
Flip-flop qubits: a whole new quantum computing architecture
Placeholder
Ancient Babylonian tablet - world's first trig table
Placeholder
Life on Earth - and Mars?
Placeholder
“Desirable defects: Nano-scale structures of piezoelectrics” – Patrick Tung
Placeholder
Keeping Your Phone Safe from Hackers
Placeholder
Thru Fuze - a revolution in chronic back pain treatment (2015)
Placeholder
Breakthrough for stem cell therapies (2016)
Placeholder
The fortune contained in your mobile phone
Placeholder
Underwater With Emma Johnston
Placeholder
Flip-flop qubits: a whole new quantum computing architecture
Placeholder
The “Dressed Qubit” - breakthrough in quantum state stability (2016)
Placeholder
Pinpointing qubits in a silicon quantum computer (2016)
Placeholder
How to build a quantum computer in silicon (2015)
Placeholder
Quantum computer coding in silicon now possible (2015)
Placeholder
Crucial hurdle overcome for quantum computing (2015)
Placeholder
New world record for silicon quantum computing (2014)
Placeholder
Quantum data at the atom's heart (2013)
Placeholder
Towards a quantum internet (2013)
Placeholder
Single-atom transistor (2012)
Placeholder
Down to the Wire (2012)
Placeholder
Landmark in quantum computing (2012)
Placeholder
1. How Quantum Computers Will Change Our World
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – What will a quantum computer do?
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – Quantum Hardware
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – Quantum Algorithms
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – Quantum Logic
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – Entanglement
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts - Quantum Measurement
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts – Spin
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts - Quantum Bits
Placeholder
Quantum Computing Concepts - Binary Logic
Placeholder
Rose Amal - Sustainable fuels from the Sun
Placeholder
Veena Sahajwalla - The E-Waste Alchemist
Placeholder
Katharina Gaus - Extreme Close-up on Immunity
Placeholder
In her element - Professor Emma Johnston
Placeholder
Martina Stenzel - Targeting Tumours with Tiny Assassins
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Why are we all athletes?
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Megafauna murder mystery
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Why are we so hairy?
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Why grannies matter
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Why do only humans experience puberty?
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Evolution of the backside
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Why we use symbols
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Evolutionary MasterChefs
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - The Paleo Diet fad
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Are races real?
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Are We Still Evolving?
Placeholder
How Did We Get Here? - Dangly Bits
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: Climate Migrants
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: De-Extinction
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: Nuclear Disasters
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: Storm Surges
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: How the Japan tsunami changed science
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: How the World Trade Centre collapsed
Placeholder
Catastrophic Science: Bushfires