How to talk about climate change like Greta Thunberg

  Last updated December 16, 2019 at 4:13 pm

Topics:  

Take some tips from Greta Thunberg to keep those family climate change talks on track this Christmas.


greta thunberg_climate action climate activist

Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg is a master of staying on topic. Credit: AAP/Julian Smith




Why This Matters: We’ve all got those family members who don’t accept the science.




As bushfires rage and our cities lie shrouded in smoke, climate change is shaping as a likely topic of conversation at the family dinner table this Christmas.


Such discussions can be fraught if family members hold differing views. You may not all agree on the urgency of dealing with climate change – or indeed whether it is happening at all.


When I teach the art of argumentation – a core skill of critical thinking – I tell my students about the concept of “point at issue”. This is what the argument is about and should be the focus of rational discussion.


But when debating emotive and controversial topics such as climate change, the point at issue can become lost.


So what to do? We can learn much from Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg – a master of staying on topic.


A simple, unwavering message


climate change_politics_christmas ornament

Family discussion about politics can be fraught – especially climate politics. Credit: Flickr


Greta Thunberg is in the Spanish capital Madrid this week for COP25 – a major conference of nations signed up to the Paris climate agreement.


Thunberg’s solo school strikes in Sweden last year sparked a global movement. But in typical rational style, Thunberg told supporters in Madrid the protests have “achieved nothing” because global emissions are still rising.


Thunberg’s public statements consistently communicate a few key points:



  • the planet is warming, we are responsible and we need to fix it

  • hope is fine, but it is pointless without action

  • economic concerns are irrelevant in the face of collapsing ecosystems

  • if we do not fix this, future generations will remember us for our failures.


Each time Thunberg speaks, these issues are centre-stage. She is not distracted by rhetoric, straw-man arguments, personal abuse, or by condescension or appeals to economic theory.




Also: How to argue better about the environment (or anything else)




For example in a TED talk in March, Greta Thunberg responds with uncommon clarity to those who seek to put the burden of action back on her:


“Some people say that I should study to become a climate scientist so that I can “solve the climate crisis.” But the climate crisis has already been solved. We already have all the facts and solutions.”


Note how the burden is placed back where it belongs: on those who have the power to act now.


Thunberg also refuses to be distracted by patronising comments. When meeting with the US Senate’s climate crisis taskforce in September, she was commended for her enthusiasm and replied:


“Please save your praise. We don’t want it […] Don’t invite us here to just tell us how inspiring we are without actually doing anything about it because it doesn’t lead to anything.”




Also: If now is not the time to talk about climate change, when is?




To claims she should be in school rather than protesting, Thunberg says:


“Why should any young person be made to study for a future when no one is doing enough to save that future? What is the point of learning facts when the most important facts given by the finest scientists are ignored by our politicians?”


Greta Thunberg says she has Asperger’s syndrome, an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). She describes it as a “superpower” which has “definitely helped me keep this focus”.


Research has found that people with ASD have a heightened ability to focus on some tasks and in particular, to identify “critical” information.


climate change_sydney smoke_syney bushfire

A smoke haze covering the east coast is bringing climate concerns to the forefront of many discussions. Credit: Stephen Saphore/AAP


Back to the dinner table


We may not have Thunberg’s natural aptitude for staying on topic. But we can apply the lessons to our own conversations with friends and family.


Let’s say I’m having an argument with a cranky uncle about renewable electricity. I might argue that we should transition to wind and solar energy because it generates less carbon dioxide than burning fossil fuels.


My uncle might respond by saying I shouldn’t use any energy at all. Maybe he’ll say “then stop driving cars” or “don’t turn on your TV”.


But this response is not addressing the point at issue – that renewable energy generates less carbon than fossil fuels. It is talking about something else: that any use of power is bad. Really, it’s not so much about using power as how that power is generated.


Moving off the point at issue is a classic “strawman” attack, when the argument is misrepresented and argued from that point.




Also: Dr Karl – Do you believe in climate change?




Keeping the argument on track, and keeping it both civil and productive, is a key skill in critical thinking. It is helped by:



  • making sure everyone is clear about what the point at issue actually is

  • bringing the conversation back to the point when it strays, or at least acknowledging that we are now talking about something else

  • calling out any misrepresentation of the point.


This will help keep the integrity of the argument intact and avoid it degenerating into an exchange of ideological blows.


If you need extra help, my colleagues and I have produced a paper to help analyse the rationality of climate denial claims. It also helps you find the point at issue, and stay on it.


This is a skill worth developing in discussion with friends and family. In the maelstrom of ideology surrounding climate change in this post-truth world, keeping a rational focus is critical.


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


More Like This


Is science still missing from society?


The terror of climate change is transforming young people’s identity




About the Author

Peter Ellerton
Peter Ellerton is the Curriculum Director of the University of Queensland Critical Thinking Project. He is also a lecturer in critical thinking in the school of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry.

Published By

For more than a century, The University of Queensland has educated and worked with outstanding people to deliver knowledge leadership for a better world. Across our three campuses, UQ’s 7000+ staff and 51,000+ students deliver and experience unparalleled teaching, learning and research excellence that creates positive change globally.


Featured Videos